Ferraro & Paresce, 1993, AJ, 106, 154 1) Separated mail header, table description, and table data. 2) Converted TeX to dvi and then to ASCII with commands: $ tex table1 $ dvi2tty -w 90 -o table1.dat table1 3) Edited TABLE1.DAT, moving the three side-by-side columns per page to a single column. Removed extraneous blanks. 4) Final checkout of the table showed that the magnitudes given for the F342W filter were consistently 0.3 magnitudes brighter than in the printed paper. Ferraro was contacted by E-mail to check that the magnitudes given in the machine-readable tables were in fact correct. 5) The response from Ferraro was that the printed numbers are the correct ones. The following is from his response: Dear Mr. Brotzman, The table 1 I sent to you by E-mail was the old not-revised version. the correct version is the published one. In fact the main variation in the revised version of the paper was that the photometric zero point in the $F342W$-filter was changed by 0.33 mag in the sense of making the new $m_{342}$ fainter. The re-scaling was necessary in order to account for an effect which had not been properly calibrated heretofore. This has to do with the fact that the FOC detector responds differently in the zoomed $50\times25\mu m$ pixel format than in the normal $25 \times 25\mu m$ pixel format. All in-orbit calibrations have been carried with the latter format and it is only recently that this effect has been properly measured. Since we used the former format for our F342W images, this correction was applied with confidence to all our data and then sent again for publishing. sincerely F.R. Ferraro 6) Reprocessed the table using the new TEX file supplied by Ferraro. 7) Generated TABLE1.DOC, standardizing table description. 8) Generated ABSTRACT.DOC, title and abstract from the paper. ----- For AAS CD-ROM Volume IV ----- 1) Converted TABLE1.DOC to CDS-style TABLE.DOC.